From 03eacbabb29d3e15a75a6b9925c85cc737f7b61e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=B0=8F=E6=A9=98?= <xiaoju@shazhou.work>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 07:50:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] feat: add debate workflow for resume integration testing

Two-role debate (against/for) with up to 3 rounds per side.
Each role re-enters with session resume, making this an ideal
integration test for cross-process session continuity.

Supports early termination via concession (conceded=true in frontmatter).

Refs #418
---
 examples/debate.yaml | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 examples/debate.yaml

diff --git a/examples/debate.yaml b/examples/debate.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..505af3f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/examples/debate.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+name: "debate"
+description: "Structured debate between two sides. Tests cross-process session resume."
+roles:
+  against:
+    description: "Argues against the proposition"
+    goal: |
+      You are a skilled debater arguing AGAINST the proposition.
+      Be logical, cite evidence, and directly address your opponent's points.
+      Keep each argument concise (under 200 words).
+    capabilities:
+      - argumentation
+      - critical-thinking
+    procedure: |
+      1. If this is the opening, present your strongest argument against the proposition.
+      2. If responding to the other side, directly counter their points with evidence and logic.
+      3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
+    output: |
+      Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
+      Set conceded to true ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
+    frontmatter:
+      type: object
+      properties:
+        argument:
+          type: string
+        conceded:
+          type: boolean
+      required: [argument, conceded]
+  for:
+    description: "Argues for the proposition"
+    goal: |
+      You are a skilled debater arguing FOR the proposition.
+      Be logical, cite evidence, and directly address your opponent's points.
+      Keep each argument concise (under 200 words).
+    capabilities:
+      - argumentation
+      - critical-thinking
+    procedure: |
+      1. Read the opposing side's latest argument carefully.
+      2. Counter their points with evidence and logic.
+      3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
+    output: |
+      Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
+      Set conceded to true ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
+    frontmatter:
+      type: object
+      properties:
+        argument:
+          type: string
+        conceded:
+          type: boolean
+      required: [argument, conceded]
+conditions:
+  againstConceded:
+    description: "The against side conceded"
+    expression: "$last('against').conceded = true"
+  forConceded:
+    description: "The for side conceded"
+    expression: "$last('for').conceded = true"
+  moreRounds:
+    description: "Fewer than 3 rounds completed per side"
+    expression: "$count(steps[role = 'against']) < 3"
+graph:
+  $START:
+    - role: "against"
+      condition: null
+      prompt: "Present your opening argument against the proposition."
+  against:
+    - role: "$END"
+      condition: "againstConceded"
+      prompt: "The against side conceded. Debate over."
+    - role: "for"
+      condition: null
+      prompt: "Counter the opposing argument. Address their points directly."
+  for:
+    - role: "$END"
+      condition: "forConceded"
+      prompt: "The for side conceded. Debate over."
+    - role: "against"
+      condition: "moreRounds"
+      prompt: "Counter the opposing argument. Address their points directly."
+    - role: "$END"
+      condition: null
+      prompt: "Maximum rounds reached. Debate over."