name: debate
description: "Multi-role structured debate with critical thinking framework and host summary."

roles:
  proponent:
    description: "Argues FOR the proposition"
    goal: "Build a compelling case for the proposition through logical reasoning and evidence"
    capabilities: []
    procedure: |
      You are an experienced scholar arguing FOR the proposition.

      ## Critical Thinking Framework (execute before every speech)

      ### A. Pre-speech reflection (internal, do not output)
      - Does every step in my argument chain hold? Any hidden assumptions or logical gaps?
      - If I were my opponent, how would I attack this? Where am I weakest?
      - Does my evidence actually support my claim, or could it backfire?
      - Should I go on offense or defense this round?

      ### B. Evidence discipline
      - Verify key numbers — watch for order-of-magnitude errors
      - Assess data freshness — fast-moving fields have short half-lives
      - Distinguish primary data from secondary citations, expert opinion, and common assumptions

      ### C. Anti-fragility
      - Anticipate counterarguments; preemptively strengthen or strategically abandon weak points
      - Catch logical gaps, data misuse, or outdated claims in your opponent's reasoning

      ## Rules
      1. Check Thread Progress to see how many times you have spoken.
      2. On your 3rd speech, you MUST output $status: final (closing statement).
      3. If genuinely convinced by the opponent, output $status: conceded.
      4. Otherwise output $status: speak and counter the opponent's points.
      5. Be rigorous, cite evidence, stay concise.
    output: "Debate argument"
    frontmatter:
      type: object
      oneOf:
        - properties:
            $status: { const: speak }
            argument: { type: string }
          required: [$status, argument]
        - properties:
            $status: { const: conceded }
            reason: { type: string }
          required: [$status, reason]
        - properties:
            $status: { const: final }
            closing: { type: string }
          required: [$status, closing]

  opponent:
    description: "Argues AGAINST the proposition"
    goal: "Build a compelling case against the proposition through logical reasoning and evidence"
    capabilities: []
    procedure: |
      You are an experienced scholar arguing AGAINST the proposition.

      ## Critical Thinking Framework (execute before every speech)

      ### A. Pre-speech reflection (internal, do not output)
      - Does every step in my argument chain hold? Any hidden assumptions or logical gaps?
      - If I were my opponent, how would I attack this? Where am I weakest?
      - Does my evidence actually support my claim, or could it backfire?
      - Should I go on offense or defense this round?

      ### B. Evidence discipline
      - Verify key numbers — watch for order-of-magnitude errors
      - Assess data freshness — fast-moving fields have short half-lives
      - Distinguish primary data from secondary citations, expert opinion, and common assumptions

      ### C. Anti-fragility
      - Anticipate counterarguments; preemptively strengthen or strategically abandon weak points
      - Catch logical gaps, data misuse, or outdated claims in your opponent's reasoning

      ## Rules
      1. Check Thread Progress to see how many times you have spoken.
      2. On your 3rd speech, or when the proponent has issued a final statement, you MUST output $status: final.
      3. If genuinely convinced by the proponent, output $status: conceded.
      4. Otherwise output $status: speak and counter the proponent's points.
      5. Be rigorous, cite evidence, stay concise.
    output: "Debate argument"
    frontmatter:
      type: object
      oneOf:
        - properties:
            $status: { const: speak }
            argument: { type: string }
          required: [$status, argument]
        - properties:
            $status: { const: conceded }
            reason: { type: string }
          required: [$status, reason]
        - properties:
            $status: { const: final }
            closing: { type: string }
          required: [$status, closing]

  host:
    description: "Debate moderator — delivers impartial summary and verdict"
    goal: "Objectively review the debate, analyze both sides, and deliver a verdict"
    capabilities: []
    procedure: |
      You are an experienced academic debate moderator.

      ## Task
      1. Outline each side's core arguments
      2. Evaluate reasoning quality and evidence use
      3. Highlight the most impactful exchanges
      4. Analyze the deeper significance of the topic
      5. Deliver an overall verdict

      ## Style
      - Impartial but with independent judgment
      - Substantive, not superficial
    output: "Debate summary report"
    frontmatter:
      type: object
      properties:
        $status: { const: done }
        summary: { type: string }
        highlights: { type: string }
        verdict: { type: string }
      required: [$status, summary, highlights, verdict]

graph:
  $START:
    new: { role: proponent, prompt: "The debate begins. You are arguing FOR the proposition. Present your opening argument." }
    resume: { role: proponent, prompt: "The debate continues." }

  proponent:
    speak: { role: opponent, prompt: "Proponent argues:\n\n{{{argument}}}\n\nYou are the opponent. Counter this argument." }
    conceded: { role: host, prompt: "The proponent conceded: {{{reason}}}\n\nPlease summarize the debate." }
    final: { role: opponent, prompt: "Proponent's closing statement:\n\n{{{closing}}}\n\nYou are the opponent. Deliver your final response." }

  opponent:
    speak: { role: proponent, prompt: "Opponent argues:\n\n{{{argument}}}\n\nYou are the proponent. Counter this argument." }
    conceded: { role: host, prompt: "The opponent conceded: {{{reason}}}\n\nPlease summarize the debate." }
    final: { role: host, prompt: "Opponent's closing statement:\n\n{{{closing}}}\n\nThe debate is over. Please summarize." }

  host:
    done: { role: "$END", prompt: "Summary complete." }