Files

2.3 KiB

Contract Processing Completeness Audit

When asked "have all contracts been reviewed/registered" for a date range, follow this exhaustive verification method. Do NOT answer from memory — every claim must be tool-verified.

Input Channels to Check (ALL of these)

  1. QiuTing private messages — gateway.log user=QiuTing chat=QiuTing msg='' (empty msg = file)
  2. Doro private messages — gateway.log user=doro chat=doro msg='' (empty msg = file)
  3. Doro group messages — gateway.log user=doro chat=wrbAFkXAAAiWC3styKqNj0bZyH6BbJ_Q msg=''
  4. Feishu messages — gateway.log feishu platform entries with media= indicators
  5. Direct Nextcloud uploads — Doro uploads directly to 待审查/ without going through gateway (indicated by Doro saying "待审查里上传了新合同" without a preceding file message)

Cross-Reference Procedure

Step 1: Count ALL file-receive events per channel in date range (gateway.log grep)
Step 2: Read tracker JSON — list all entries in date range by seq
Step 3: Read xlsx — verify 1:1 match with tracker
Step 4: Check 待审查/ directory for unprocessed files
Step 5: Check 任务交付/ for delivered but un-tracked files
Step 6: Reconcile: total received (Step 1) vs total tracked (Step 2)
        Account for: duplicates (Doro said "重复了 不用审了"), non-contracts (excluded), 
        multi-file batches, files awaiting pass

Critical Rule

Never say "查证属实无遗漏" unless ALL channels have been checked and reconciled. If a channel cannot be fully verified (e.g., log doesn't record filenames for empty messages), state the uncertainty explicitly.

Pitfalls (from 2026-06-29 incident)

  • Doro sends files via private chat AND uploads directly to Nextcloud — both channels must be checked
  • Gateway log records msg='' for file messages but does NOT record the filename — you cannot map file→contract from log alone
  • When Doro says "2份 顾问单位是X", the number must be verified against tracker entries matching that party
  • A contract may be tracked under a different party name than expected (e.g., "重固卫生服务中心" contract could be filed under the actual contract title without "重固" in it)
  • Session memory is NOT verification — "I remember processing it" is not evidence