docs: expand .cards — vision, comparisons, business rationale, open questions
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s

26 cards covering:
- Project philosophy (session isolation, process discipline, dissipative structure)
- Comparisons (vs skill, vs dynamic workflow)
- Business rationale (FTE vs vendor, OPC, switching cost)
- Learning model (memory + skill + workflow)
- Self-improvement (reflective workflow, eval)
- Open questions (workflow granularity, human-in-the-loop)
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-07 11:43:36 +00:00
parent f697aec3e7
commit 04e2b5b8a7
21 changed files with 485 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
---
title: "Skill vs Workflow — Different Layers"
created: "2026-06-07"
source: "openclaw-xiaomo"
tags: [architecture, decision]
category: "architecture"
links:
- session-isolation-as-cognitive-reset
- cognitive-process-orchestration
- agency-over-content-not-process
---
Skill 和 workflow 不是替代关系,是不同层次。
**Skill** 管的是一个 session 内怎么做——给 agent 的指令和方法论。你可以在 skill 里写"先规划再编码再 review",但 agent 始终在同一个 session 里,review 自己刚写的代码时带着全部决策记忆。确认偏误无法靠 prompt 消除。
**Workflow** 管的是 session 之间怎么协作——强制 session 断裂,reviewer 进来时不知道 developer 当时为什么做那个选择,只看到产出物。这个隔离不是靠自律,是靠结构。
两者正交:workflow 的每个 role 里面完全可以加载 skill。Skill 提升单个 session 的能力,workflow 编排多个 session 的协作关系。