docs: expand .cards — vision, comparisons, business rationale, open questions
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
26 cards covering: - Project philosophy (session isolation, process discipline, dissipative structure) - Comparisons (vs skill, vs dynamic workflow) - Business rationale (FTE vs vendor, OPC, switching cost) - Learning model (memory + skill + workflow) - Self-improvement (reflective workflow, eval) - Open questions (workflow granularity, human-in-the-loop)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Three Learning Carriers — Memory, Skill, Workflow"
|
||||
created: "2026-06-07"
|
||||
source: "openclaw-xiaomo"
|
||||
tags: [architecture, pattern]
|
||||
category: "architecture"
|
||||
links:
|
||||
- agent-as-graduate
|
||||
- skill-vs-workflow-different-layers
|
||||
- when-skill-is-not-enough
|
||||
- opc-why-fte-agents-matter-most
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
完整的 FTE agent 需要三层能力载体,缺一不可:
|
||||
|
||||
- **记忆强化知识** — 事实性积累。"这个客户偏好什么"、"上次这个 API 出过什么问题"。让 agent 越来越懂你的业务上下文。
|
||||
- **Skill 强化技能** — 单个 session 内的方法论。"怎么做 code review"、"怎么写测试"。提升每个环节的执行质量。
|
||||
- **Workflow 强化纪律** — session 之间的协作结构。"做一个 feature 必须经过哪些步骤"。保证流程可靠性和多视角制衡。
|
||||
|
||||
三者互补:光有 workflow 没有 skill,每个环节执行质量差;光有 skill 没有 workflow,能力强但不守规矩;光有记忆没有前两者,知道很多但不会做事。
|
||||
|
||||
出厂能力同样重要——底座模型 + 技能包决定毕业生的起点。名校博士和高中毕业,出厂就不同。但出厂能力是必要不充分的,FTE 的长期价值靠三层载体的持续积累。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user