feat: migrate examples to status-based routing + fix mustache HTML escape
- Migrate solve-issue.yaml, analyze-topic.yaml, debate.yaml to new format
- Add status enum field to all role frontmatter schemas
- Use {{{ }}} (triple mustache) for prompt templates with user content
- Disable mustache HTML escaping globally (prompts are plain text, not HTML)
- Add 2 new tests for HTML escape behavior
- 9 moderator tests pass
Phase 2 of #490 (closes #492)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ roles:
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["_"]
|
||||
thesis:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
keyPoints:
|
||||
@@ -30,14 +32,9 @@ roles:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
caveats:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [thesis, keyPoints]
|
||||
conditions: {}
|
||||
required: [status, thesis, keyPoints]
|
||||
graph:
|
||||
$START:
|
||||
- role: "analyst"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Analyze the topic in the task and produce a structured summary with key points."
|
||||
_: { role: "analyst", prompt: "Analyze the topic in the task and produce a structured summary with key points." }
|
||||
analyst:
|
||||
- role: "$END"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Analysis complete. Finish the workflow."
|
||||
_: { role: "$END", prompt: "Analysis complete. Finish the workflow." }
|
||||
|
||||
+15
-30
@@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ roles:
|
||||
3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
|
||||
output: |
|
||||
Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
|
||||
Set conceded to true ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Set status to "conceded" ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Otherwise set status to "continue".
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["continue", "conceded"]
|
||||
argument:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
conceded:
|
||||
type: boolean
|
||||
required: [argument, conceded]
|
||||
required: [status, argument]
|
||||
for:
|
||||
description: "Argues for the proposition"
|
||||
goal: |
|
||||
@@ -40,38 +41,22 @@ roles:
|
||||
3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
|
||||
output: |
|
||||
Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
|
||||
Set conceded to true ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Set status to "conceded" ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Otherwise set status to "continue".
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["continue", "conceded"]
|
||||
argument:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
conceded:
|
||||
type: boolean
|
||||
required: [argument, conceded]
|
||||
conditions:
|
||||
againstConceded:
|
||||
description: "The against side conceded"
|
||||
expression: "$last('against').conceded = true"
|
||||
forConceded:
|
||||
description: "The for side conceded"
|
||||
expression: "$last('for').conceded = true"
|
||||
required: [status, argument]
|
||||
graph:
|
||||
$START:
|
||||
- role: "against"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Present your opening argument against the proposition."
|
||||
_: { role: "against", prompt: "Present your opening argument against the proposition." }
|
||||
against:
|
||||
- role: "$END"
|
||||
condition: "againstConceded"
|
||||
prompt: "The against side conceded. Debate over."
|
||||
- role: "for"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Counter the opposing argument. Address their points directly."
|
||||
conceded: { role: "$END", prompt: "The against side conceded. Debate over." }
|
||||
continue: { role: "for", prompt: "Counter the opposing argument: {{{argument}}}" }
|
||||
for:
|
||||
- role: "$END"
|
||||
condition: "forConceded"
|
||||
prompt: "The for side conceded. Debate over."
|
||||
- role: "against"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Counter the opposing argument. Address their points directly."
|
||||
conceded: { role: "$END", prompt: "The for side conceded. Debate over." }
|
||||
continue: { role: "against", prompt: "Counter the opposing argument: {{{argument}}}" }
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-24
@@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ roles:
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["_"]
|
||||
repoPath:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [repoPath, plan]
|
||||
required: [status, repoPath, plan]
|
||||
developer:
|
||||
description: "Implements code changes"
|
||||
goal: "You are a developer agent. You implement code changes according to plans."
|
||||
@@ -50,13 +52,15 @@ roles:
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["_"]
|
||||
filesChanged:
|
||||
type: array
|
||||
items:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
summary:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [filesChanged, summary]
|
||||
required: [status, filesChanged, summary]
|
||||
reviewer:
|
||||
description: "Reviews code changes"
|
||||
goal: "You are a code reviewer. You review implementations for correctness and quality."
|
||||
@@ -71,32 +75,18 @@ roles:
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
approved:
|
||||
type: boolean
|
||||
status:
|
||||
enum: ["approved", "rejected"]
|
||||
comments:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [approved, comments]
|
||||
conditions:
|
||||
notApproved:
|
||||
description: "Reviewer rejected the implementation"
|
||||
expression: "$last('reviewer').approved = false"
|
||||
required: [status, comments]
|
||||
graph:
|
||||
$START:
|
||||
- role: "planner"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Analyze the issue described in the task and produce a detailed implementation plan."
|
||||
_: { role: "planner", prompt: "Analyze the issue described in the task and produce a detailed implementation plan." }
|
||||
planner:
|
||||
- role: "developer"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Implement the plan from the planner. Write code, tests, and ensure existing tests pass."
|
||||
_: { role: "developer", prompt: "Implement the plan from the planner. Write code, tests, and ensure existing tests pass." }
|
||||
developer:
|
||||
- role: "reviewer"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "Review the developer's implementation against the plan for correctness and quality."
|
||||
_: { role: "reviewer", prompt: "Review the developer's implementation against the plan for correctness and quality." }
|
||||
reviewer:
|
||||
- role: "developer"
|
||||
condition: "notApproved"
|
||||
prompt: "The reviewer rejected your implementation. Read their feedback and fix the issues."
|
||||
- role: "$END"
|
||||
condition: null
|
||||
prompt: "The review passed. Complete the workflow."
|
||||
approved: { role: "$END", prompt: "The review passed. Complete the workflow." }
|
||||
rejected: { role: "developer", prompt: "The reviewer rejected your implementation. Read their feedback and fix the issues: {{{comments}}}" }
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user