fix(workflow): add --repo flag to tea pr create in worktree dirs

Fixes #474

.workflows/solve-issue.yaml

@@ -137,8 +137,11 @@ roles:
       2. Commit with a descriptive message referencing the issue: `git commit -m "type: description\n\nFixes #N"`
       3. Push the branch: `git push -u origin <branch-name>`
          - If push hook fails: capture the error log in your output, mark hook_failed
-      4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --title "..." --description "..."`
+      4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --repo uncaged/workflow --title "..." --description "..."`
+         - The `--repo` flag is required to work in worktree directories (fixes #474 "path segment [0] is empty" error)
+         - If working on a different repo, extract owner/repo from: `git remote get-url origin | sed 's/.*[:/]\([^/]*\/[^.]*\).*/\1/'`
          - PR description must follow the project template: What / Why / Changes / Ref sections, with `Fixes #N` in Ref
+         - On tea failure: capture stderr/stdout, log the error clearly, include PR details (title, description, branch) for manual creation, and mark success=false
       5. After PR creation, clean up the worktree:
          - `cd ~/repos/workflow`
          - `git worktree remove ~/repos/workflow-worktrees/fix/<issue-number>-<slug>`

packages/cli-workflow/src/__tests__/solve-issue-tea-worktree.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
+import { join } from "node:path";
+import type { WorkflowPayload } from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
+import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest";
+import { parse } from "yaml";
+
+/**
+ * Test: Issue #474 - tea pr create fails in git worktree directories
+ *
+ * This test verifies that the solve-issue workflow's committer role
+ * includes the --repo flag when running tea pr create, which fixes
+ * the "path segment [0] is empty" error in worktree directories.
+ */
+
+describe("solve-issue workflow: tea pr create worktree fix", () => {
+  // Navigate up from packages/cli-workflow to repo root
+  const workflowPath = join(process.cwd(), "..", "..", ".workflows", "solve-issue.yaml");
+
+  test("committer procedure should include --repo flag in tea pr create command", async () => {
+    const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
+    const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as WorkflowPayload;
+
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer).toBeDefined();
+    const committerProcedure = workflow.roles.committer?.procedure;
+    expect(committerProcedure).toBeDefined();
+
+    // Verify the procedure includes tea pr create with --repo flag
+    expect(committerProcedure).toContain("tea pr create");
+    expect(committerProcedure).toContain("--repo");
+
+    // Verify the --repo flag appears before or together with tea pr create
+    // This ensures the command is: tea pr create --repo <owner/repo> ...
+    const teaPrCreateMatch = committerProcedure?.match(/tea pr create[^\n]*/);
+    expect(teaPrCreateMatch).not.toBeNull();
+
+    if (teaPrCreateMatch) {
+      const teaCommandLine = teaPrCreateMatch[0];
+      expect(teaCommandLine).toContain("--repo");
+    }
+  });
+
+  test("committer procedure should mention repo extraction from git remote", async () => {
+    const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
+    const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as WorkflowPayload;
+
+    const committerProcedure = workflow.roles.committer?.procedure;
+    expect(committerProcedure).toBeDefined();
+
+    // Verify the procedure mentions extracting repo info from git remote
+    // This ensures fallback logic is documented
+    expect(committerProcedure).toMatch(/git remote/i);
+  });
+
+  test("committer procedure should include error handling for tea failures", async () => {
+    const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
+    const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as WorkflowPayload;
+
+    const committerProcedure = workflow.roles.committer?.procedure;
+    expect(committerProcedure).toBeDefined();
+
+    // Verify the procedure includes error handling guidance
+    // This ensures we capture failures and provide actionable output
+    expect(committerProcedure).toMatch(/error|fail/i);
+  });
+
+  test("workflow should be parseable as valid WorkflowPayload", async () => {
+    const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
+    const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as WorkflowPayload;
+
+    // Basic structure validation
+    expect(workflow.name).toBe("solve-issue");
+    expect(workflow.roles).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.conditions).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.graph).toBeDefined();
+
+    // Verify committer role exists with required fields
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer?.description).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer?.goal).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer?.procedure).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer?.output).toBeDefined();
+    expect(workflow.roles.committer?.frontmatter).toBeDefined();
+  });
+
+  test("committer frontmatter schema should require success field", async () => {
+    const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
+    // Parse as any to access the raw YAML structure (frontmatter is inline JSON Schema in YAML)
+    // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
+    const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as any;
+
+    const frontmatter = workflow.roles.committer?.frontmatter;
+    expect(frontmatter).toBeDefined();
+    expect(frontmatter?.type).toBe("object");
+    expect(frontmatter?.properties?.success).toBeDefined();
+    expect(frontmatter?.properties?.success?.type).toBe("boolean");
+    expect(frontmatter?.required).toContain("success");
+  });
+});