Compare commits

...

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
xiaoju 99a2890be2 feat: remove LLM extract fallback, require YAML frontmatter
Agent output must contain valid YAML frontmatter matching the role schema.
If frontmatter parsing fails, the step fails immediately with a clear error
instead of falling back to an LLM extraction that can fabricate values.

The extract module remains as a public API export but is no longer used
in the agent run loop.

Breaking change: agents that relied on LLM extraction to produce valid
output will now fail. They must output proper frontmatter.
2026-05-22 08:58:01 +00:00
xiaomo 2eb5ee0666 Merge pull request 'fix: accept omitted condition in fallback transitions' (#378) from fix/fallback-transition-validation into main 2026-05-22 07:56:18 +00:00
xiaoju e67932c83c fix: accept omitted condition in fallback transitions
Fallback transitions (last entry in graph node) omit the condition
field in YAML, resulting in undefined instead of null. The validator
and materializer now handle this:

- validate.ts: accept undefined as valid condition value
- workflow.ts: normalizeGraph() coerces undefined → null before CAS put

This was broken by the graph fallback pattern introduced in #370.
2026-05-22 07:38:24 +00:00
xiaomo 04a12231c3 Merge pull request 'feat: register $first/$last JSONata functions in moderator' (#377) from feat/376-first-last-jsonata into main 2026-05-22 07:32:17 +00:00
xiaoju e5ae9a134c feat: register $first/$last JSONata functions in moderator
Register custom $first(role) and $last(role) functions in the JSONata
evaluator. These search the steps array and return the matching role's
frontmatter (output) directly, replacing verbose steps[-1].output.x
expressions with semantic $last('role').field syntax.

- workflow-moderator: register functions via expr.registerFunction()
- Updated all condition expressions in .workflows/ and examples/
- Added tests for $last, $first, and unmatched role (undefined)

Fixes #376
2026-05-22 06:29:56 +00:00
xiaomo bdafaf3aa1 Merge pull request 'refactor!: rename RoleDefinition.meta → frontmatter' (#375) from refactor/374-meta-to-frontmatter into main 2026-05-22 06:06:06 +00:00
xiaoju 02f7f0b708 refactor!: rename RoleDefinition.meta → frontmatter
BREAKING CHANGE: All workflow YAML files must use 'frontmatter' instead of 'meta'.

- workflow-protocol: RoleDefinition.meta → frontmatter, schema updated
- cli-workflow: validate.ts, workflow.ts — resolveMetaRef → resolveFrontmatterRef
- workflow-agent-kit: run.ts — metaSchema → frontmatterSchema
- All YAML files updated (examples/, .workflows/)

Fixes #374
2026-05-22 06:05:07 +00:00
xiaoju 8ea554bb5e Merge pull request 'feat: create .workflows/solve-issue.yaml' (#372) from feat/370-solve-issue-workflow into main 2026-05-22 06:02:15 +00:00
xiaoju 8a425521da fix: output instructions now specify required frontmatter meta fields 2026-05-22 05:42:17 +00:00
xiaoju f174f2fd0a fix: remove redundant condition null from $START 2026-05-22 05:33:39 +00:00
xiaoju 355594d074 refactor: graph fallback pattern + positive condition names
- Last transition in each graph node is now the fallback (no condition)
- Remove redundant positive conditions (ready, devDone, approved, passed, pushSuccess)
- notApproved → rejected (positive naming)
2026-05-22 05:31:43 +00:00
xiaoju fd7609fe90 fix: address review feedback from xingyue
1. npm/npx → bun/bunx (project standard)
2. Fix tea CLI usage (tea comment + -r flag)
3. cursor-agent → coding (abstract capability)
4. Clarify committer inherits developer's worktree
5. Mark meta.plan required when status=ready
6. PR description must follow What/Why/Changes/Ref template
7. Note maxRounds loop protection in description
2026-05-22 05:27:21 +00:00
xiaoju dacecfbbb7 feat: create .workflows/solve-issue.yaml
TDD-driven issue resolution workflow with 5 roles:
- planner: analyzes issue, outputs TDD test spec (stored in CAS)
- developer: implements code following TDD
- reviewer: code standards compliance check (not functionality)
- tester: functional correctness verification
- committer: commits and creates PR

Graph handles bounce-backs: reviewer→developer, tester→developer,
tester→planner (fix_spec), committer→developer (hook_failed).

Refs #370
2026-05-22 05:21:19 +00:00
xiaomo 3238eaeddf Merge pull request 'feat: add uwf skill cli command and Prepare section' (#371) from feat/369-uwf-skill-cli into main 2026-05-22 04:50:12 +00:00
10 changed files with 376 additions and 42 deletions
+167
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
name: "solve-issue"
description: "TDD-driven issue resolution for small, focused changes. Loop protection relies on engine maxRounds."
roles:
planner:
description: "Analyzes issue and outputs a TDD test spec"
goal: "You are a planning agent. You analyze Gitea issues and produce a TDD test specification that downstream roles will implement and verify."
capabilities:
- issue-analysis
- planning
procedure: |
On first run (no previous steps):
1. Read the issue and all comments from Gitea using `tea issues <number> -r <owner/repo>`
2. Read CLAUDE.md (or equivalent project conventions file) to understand coding standards
3. Assess whether the issue has enough information to produce a test spec
4. If insufficient info: comment on the issue via `echo "..." | tea comment <number> -r <owner/repo>` (skip if you already commented), then output status=insufficient_info and terminate
5. If sufficient: produce a detailed TDD test spec in markdown covering all scenarios
On subsequent runs (bounced back by tester with fix_spec):
1. Read the tester's output from the previous step to understand what's wrong with the spec
2. Revise the test spec accordingly
After producing the test spec:
1. Store it via `uwf cas put "<markdown content>"` and capture the returned hash
2. Put the hash in meta.plan (required when status=ready)
output: "Output a brief summary of the test spec. Frontmatter must include: status (ready or insufficient_info) and plan (CAS hash of the test spec, required when status=ready)."
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
status:
type: string
enum: [ready, insufficient_info]
plan:
type: string
required: [status]
developer:
description: "TDD implementation per test spec"
goal: "You are a developer agent. You implement code changes following TDD — write tests first, then implementation."
capabilities:
- coding
procedure: |
1. Read the test spec from CAS: `uwf cas get <plan hash>` (find the hash from the latest planner step's meta.plan)
2. If bounced back from reviewer or tester: read the previous role's output to understand what needs fixing
3. Write tests first based on the spec
4. Implement the code to make tests pass
5. Ensure `bun run build` passes with no errors
6. Run `bun test` to verify all tests pass
output: "List all files changed and provide a summary. Frontmatter must include: status (done or failed)."
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
status:
type: string
enum: [done, failed]
required: [status]
reviewer:
description: "Code standards compliance check"
goal: "You are a code reviewer. You verify code standards compliance — NOT functionality (that's the tester's job)."
capabilities:
- code-review
- static-analysis
procedure: |
Hard checks (must all pass):
1. `bun run build` — no build errors
2. `bunx biome check` — no lint violations
3. TypeScript strict mode — no type errors
Soft checks (review against CLAUDE.md conventions):
- Functional-first: `function` + `type`, not `class` + `interface`
- No optional properties (`?:`) — use `T | null`
- Naming conventions (kebab-case files, PascalCase types, camelCase functions)
- Module boundary discipline (folder exports via index.ts)
- No `console.log` (use structured logger)
- No dynamic imports in production code
Only review standards compliance. Do NOT test functionality.
If rejecting, you MUST explain the specific reason in your output.
output: "Explain your decision with specific file/line references. Frontmatter must include: approved (true or false)."
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
approved:
type: boolean
required: [approved]
tester:
description: "Functional correctness verification"
goal: "You are a tester agent. You verify that the implementation correctly satisfies every scenario in the test spec."
capabilities:
- testing
procedure: |
1. Run `bun test` for automated test verification
2. Read the test spec from CAS: `uwf cas get <plan hash>` (find the hash from the latest planner step's meta.plan)
3. Verify each scenario in the spec is covered and passing
4. Determine outcome:
- passed: all scenarios verified, tests pass
- fix_code: tests fail or implementation doesn't match spec → send back to developer
- fix_spec: the spec itself is wrong or incomplete → send back to planner
output: "Report test results per scenario. Frontmatter must include: status (passed, fix_code, or fix_spec)."
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
status:
type: string
enum: [passed, fix_code, fix_spec]
required: [status]
committer:
description: "Commits and creates PR"
goal: "You are a committer agent. You create a clean commit and push a PR linking the original issue."
capabilities: []
procedure: |
Note: You inherit the developer's worktree and branch. Do NOT create a new branch.
1. Stage all changes: `git add -A`
2. Commit with a descriptive message referencing the issue: `git commit -m "type: description\n\nFixes #N"`
3. Push the branch: `git push -u origin <branch-name>`
- If push hook fails: capture the error log in your output, mark hook_failed
4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --title "..." --description "..."`
- PR description must follow the project template: What / Why / Changes / Ref sections, with `Fixes #N` in Ref
output: "Include PR URL on success or error log on failure. Frontmatter must include: success (true or false)."
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
success:
type: boolean
required: [success]
conditions:
insufficientInfo:
description: "Planner determined there's not enough info to proceed"
expression: "$last('planner').status = 'insufficient_info'"
devFailed:
description: "Developer failed to implement"
expression: "$last('developer').status = 'failed'"
rejected:
description: "Reviewer rejected the implementation"
expression: "$last('reviewer').approved = false"
fixCode:
description: "Tester found code issues"
expression: "$last('tester').status = 'fix_code'"
fixSpec:
description: "Tester found spec issues"
expression: "$last('tester').status = 'fix_spec'"
hookFailed:
description: "Push hook failed"
expression: "$last('committer').success = false"
graph:
$START:
- role: "planner"
planner:
- role: "$END"
condition: "insufficientInfo"
- role: "developer"
developer:
- role: "$END"
condition: "devFailed"
- role: "reviewer"
reviewer:
- role: "developer"
condition: "rejected"
- role: "tester"
tester:
- role: "developer"
condition: "fixCode"
- role: "planner"
condition: "fixSpec"
- role: "committer"
committer:
- role: "developer"
condition: "hookFailed"
- role: "$END"
+1 -1
View File
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ roles:
output: |
Provide your analysis as markdown under the frontmatter.
The frontmatter must include your structured findings.
meta:
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
thesis:
+4 -4
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ roles:
- planning
procedure: "Analyze the issue and create a detailed, actionable implementation plan."
output: "Output the plan summary and list of concrete steps."
meta:
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
plan:
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ roles:
- testing
procedure: "Implement the plan. Write code, tests, and ensure existing tests pass."
output: "List all files changed and provide a summary of the implementation."
meta:
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
filesChanged:
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ roles:
- static-analysis
procedure: "Review the implementation against the plan. Check for bugs, edge cases, and style."
output: "Approve or reject with detailed comments explaining your decision."
meta:
frontmatter:
type: object
properties:
approved:
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ roles:
conditions:
notApproved:
description: "Reviewer rejected the implementation"
expression: "steps[-1].output.approved = false"
expression: "$last('reviewer').approved = false"
graph:
$START:
- role: "planner"
+34 -8
View File
@@ -2,7 +2,12 @@ import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
import type { JSONSchema } from "@uncaged/json-cas";
import { putSchema, validate } from "@uncaged/json-cas";
import type { CasRef, RoleDefinition, WorkflowPayload } from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
import type {
CasRef,
RoleDefinition,
Transition,
WorkflowPayload,
} from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
import { parse } from "yaml";
import {
@@ -46,11 +51,28 @@ function isJsonSchema(value: unknown): value is JSONSchema {
return typeof value === "object" && value !== null && !Array.isArray(value);
}
async function resolveMetaRef(uwf: UwfStore, roleName: string, meta: unknown): Promise<CasRef> {
if (!isJsonSchema(meta)) {
fail(`role "${roleName}": meta must be a JSON Schema object`);
/** Normalize graph transitions: ensure condition is null (not undefined) for fallback entries. */
function normalizeGraph(graph: Record<string, Transition[]>): Record<string, Transition[]> {
const result: Record<string, Transition[]> = {};
for (const [node, transitions] of Object.entries(graph)) {
result[node] = transitions.map((t) => ({
role: t.role,
condition: t.condition ?? null,
}));
}
const schema: JSONSchema = meta.title === undefined ? { ...meta, title: roleName } : meta;
return result;
}
async function resolveFrontmatterRef(
uwf: UwfStore,
roleName: string,
frontmatter: unknown,
): Promise<CasRef> {
if (!isJsonSchema(frontmatter)) {
fail(`role "${roleName}": frontmatter must be a JSON Schema object`);
}
const schema: JSONSchema =
frontmatter.title === undefined ? { ...frontmatter, title: roleName } : frontmatter;
return putSchema(uwf.store, schema);
}
@@ -60,14 +82,18 @@ export async function materializeWorkflowPayload(
): Promise<WorkflowPayload> {
const roles: Record<string, RoleDefinition> = {};
for (const [roleName, role] of Object.entries(raw.roles)) {
const meta = await resolveMetaRef(uwf, `${raw.name}.${roleName}`, role.meta);
const frontmatter = await resolveFrontmatterRef(
uwf,
`${raw.name}.${roleName}`,
role.frontmatter,
);
roles[roleName] = {
description: role.description,
goal: role.goal,
capabilities: role.capabilities,
procedure: role.procedure,
output: role.output,
meta,
frontmatter,
};
}
return {
@@ -75,7 +101,7 @@ export async function materializeWorkflowPayload(
description: raw.description,
roles,
conditions: raw.conditions,
graph: raw.graph,
graph: normalizeGraph(raw.graph),
};
}
+7 -4
View File
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ function isRoleDefinition(value: unknown): boolean {
if (!isRecord(value)) {
return false;
}
const meta = value.meta;
const metaOk = isRecord(meta) && typeof meta.type === "string";
const frontmatter = value.frontmatter;
const frontmatterOk = isRecord(frontmatter) && typeof frontmatter.type === "string";
const capabilities = value.capabilities;
const capabilitiesOk =
Array.isArray(capabilities) && capabilities.every((c) => typeof c === "string");
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ function isRoleDefinition(value: unknown): boolean {
capabilitiesOk &&
typeof value.procedure === "string" &&
typeof value.output === "string" &&
metaOk
frontmatterOk
);
}
@@ -42,7 +42,10 @@ function isTransition(value: unknown): boolean {
return false;
}
const condition = value.condition;
return typeof value.role === "string" && (condition === null || typeof condition === "string");
return (
typeof value.role === "string" &&
(condition === null || condition === undefined || typeof condition === "string")
);
}
function isStringRecord(value: unknown, itemCheck: (item: unknown) => boolean): boolean {
+10 -16
View File
@@ -3,10 +3,9 @@ import type { CasRef, StepNodePayload, ThreadId } from "@uncaged/workflow-protoc
import { config as loadDotenv } from "dotenv";
import { buildOutputFormatInstruction } from "./build-output-format-instruction.js";
import { buildContextWithMeta } from "./context.js";
import { extract } from "./extract.js";
import { tryFrontmatterFastPath } from "./frontmatter.js";
import type { AgentStore } from "./storage.js";
import { getEnvPath, loadWorkflowConfig, resolveStorageRoot } from "./storage.js";
import { getEnvPath, resolveStorageRoot } from "./storage.js";
import type { AgentContext, AgentOptions, AgentRunResult } from "./types.js";
function fail(message: string): never {
@@ -73,24 +72,19 @@ async function runAgent(options: AgentOptions, ctx: AgentContext): Promise<Agent
async function extractOutput(
rawOutput: string,
outputSchema: CasRef,
storageRoot: string,
ctx: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof buildContextWithMeta>>,
): Promise<CasRef> {
const fastPath = await runWithMessage("frontmatter fast path", () =>
tryFrontmatterFastPath(rawOutput, outputSchema, ctx.meta.store),
).catch(() => null);
const fastPath = await tryFrontmatterFastPath(rawOutput, outputSchema, ctx.meta.store);
if (fastPath !== null) {
return fastPath.outputHash;
}
const config = await runWithMessage("failed to load config", () =>
loadWorkflowConfig(storageRoot),
fail(
"Agent output does not contain valid YAML frontmatter matching the role schema.\n" +
"The agent must output a YAML frontmatter block (--- delimited) as the first thing in its response.\n" +
`Raw output (first 500 chars): ${rawOutput.slice(0, 500)}`,
);
const extracted = await runWithMessage("extract failed", () =>
extract(rawOutput, outputSchema, config),
);
return extracted.hash;
}
async function persistStep(options: {
@@ -130,13 +124,13 @@ export function createAgent(options: AgentOptions): () => Promise<void> {
fail(`unknown role: ${role}`);
}
const metaSchema = getSchema(ctx.meta.store, roleDef.meta);
if (metaSchema !== null) {
ctx.outputFormatInstruction = buildOutputFormatInstruction(metaSchema);
const frontmatterSchema = getSchema(ctx.meta.store, roleDef.frontmatter);
if (frontmatterSchema !== null) {
ctx.outputFormatInstruction = buildOutputFormatInstruction(frontmatterSchema);
}
const agentResult = await runAgent(options, ctx);
const outputHash = await extractOutput(agentResult.output, roleDef.meta, storageRoot, ctx);
const outputHash = await extractOutput(agentResult.output, roleDef.frontmatter, ctx);
const stepHash = await persistStep({
ctx,
outputHash,
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ const solveIssueWorkflow: WorkflowPayload = {
conditions: {
needsClarification: {
description: "Planner requests clarification from user",
expression: "$exists(steps[-1].output.needsClarification)",
expression: "$exists($last('planner').needsClarification)",
},
notApproved: {
rejected: {
description: "Reviewer rejected the implementation",
expression: "steps[-1].output.approved = false",
expression: "$last('reviewer').approved = false",
},
},
graph: {
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ const solveIssueWorkflow: WorkflowPayload = {
],
developer: [{ role: "reviewer", condition: null }],
reviewer: [
{ role: "developer", condition: "notApproved" },
{ role: "developer", condition: "rejected" },
{ role: "$END", condition: null },
],
},
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ describe("evaluate", () => {
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, value: "planner" });
});
test("condition match (notApproved → developer)", async () => {
test("condition match (rejected → developer)", async () => {
const context = makeContext([
{
role: "reviewer",
@@ -126,4 +126,116 @@ describe("evaluate", () => {
const result = await evaluate(solveIssueWorkflow, context);
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, value: "developer" });
});
test("$last returns most recent matching role's frontmatter", async () => {
const workflow: WorkflowPayload = {
...solveIssueWorkflow,
conditions: {
devFailed: {
description: "Developer failed",
expression: "$last('developer').status = 'failed'",
},
},
graph: {
$START: [{ role: "developer", condition: null }],
developer: [
{ role: "$END", condition: "devFailed" },
{ role: "reviewer", condition: null },
],
},
};
const context = makeContext([
{
role: "developer",
output: { status: "done" },
detail: "1VPBG9SM5E7WK",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
{
role: "reviewer",
output: { approved: false },
detail: "2MXBG6PN4A8JR",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
{
role: "developer",
output: { status: "failed" },
detail: "3QNTH7WK8D2PA",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
]);
const result = await evaluate(workflow, context);
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, value: "$END" });
});
test("$first returns earliest matching role's frontmatter", async () => {
const workflow: WorkflowPayload = {
...solveIssueWorkflow,
conditions: {
firstPlanReady: {
description: "First planner run was ready",
expression: "$first('planner').status = 'ready'",
},
},
graph: {
$START: [{ role: "planner", condition: null }],
planner: [
{ role: "$END", condition: "firstPlanReady" },
{ role: "developer", condition: null },
],
},
};
const context = makeContext([
{
role: "planner",
output: { status: "ready", plan: "ABC123" },
detail: "7BQST3VW9F2MA",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
{
role: "developer",
output: { status: "done" },
detail: "1VPBG9SM5E7WK",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
{
role: "planner",
output: { status: "revised", plan: "DEF456" },
detail: "4RNMK6PX8B3WQ",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
]);
const result = await evaluate(workflow, context);
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, value: "$END" });
});
test("$last returns undefined for unmatched role", async () => {
const workflow: WorkflowPayload = {
...solveIssueWorkflow,
conditions: {
hasReviewer: {
description: "Reviewer has run",
expression: "$exists($last('reviewer'))",
},
},
graph: {
$START: [{ role: "planner", condition: null }],
planner: [
{ role: "$END", condition: "hasReviewer" },
{ role: "developer", condition: null },
],
},
};
const context = makeContext([
{
role: "planner",
output: { status: "ready" },
detail: "7BQST3VW9F2MA",
agent: "uwf-hermes",
},
]);
const result = await evaluate(workflow, context);
// no reviewer step → $exists returns false → fallback to developer
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, value: "developer" });
});
});
+33 -1
View File
@@ -21,12 +21,44 @@ function isTruthy(value: unknown): boolean {
return true;
}
function findByRole(
steps: ModeratorContext["steps"],
role: string,
direction: "first" | "last",
): unknown {
if (direction === "last") {
for (let i = steps.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (steps[i].role === role) {
return steps[i].output;
}
}
} else {
for (const step of steps) {
if (step.role === role) {
return step.output;
}
}
}
return undefined;
}
async function evaluateJsonata(
expression: string,
context: ModeratorContext,
): Promise<Result<unknown, Error>> {
try {
const result = await jsonata(expression).evaluate(context);
const expr = jsonata(expression);
expr.registerFunction(
"first",
(role: string) => findByRole(context.steps, role, "first"),
"<s:x>",
);
expr.registerFunction(
"last",
(role: string) => findByRole(context.steps, role, "last"),
"<s:x>",
);
const result = await expr.evaluate(context);
return { ok: true, value: result };
} catch (error) {
return {
+2 -2
View File
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ import type { JSONSchema } from "@uncaged/json-cas";
const ROLE_DEFINITION: JSONSchema = {
type: "object",
required: ["description", "goal", "capabilities", "procedure", "output", "meta"],
required: ["description", "goal", "capabilities", "procedure", "output", "frontmatter"],
properties: {
description: { type: "string" },
goal: { type: "string" },
capabilities: { type: "array", items: { type: "string" } },
procedure: { type: "string" },
output: { type: "string" },
meta: { type: "string", format: "cas_ref" },
frontmatter: { type: "string", format: "cas_ref" },
},
additionalProperties: false,
};
+1 -1
View File
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ export type RoleDefinition = {
capabilities: string[];
procedure: string;
output: string;
meta: CasRef;
frontmatter: CasRef;
};
export type Transition = {