docs: upgrade debate example — 3 roles, oneOf routing, bounded termination
CI / check (pull_request) Failing after 11m23s
CI / check (pull_request) Failing after 11m23s
Replace the original 2-role debate with a 3-role version featuring: - proponent/opponent/host roles (was: for/against) - oneOf + const status routing (was: enum) - Critical thinking framework in procedure (pre-speech reflection, evidence discipline, anti-fragility) - Bounded termination via Thread Progress (3rd speech → final) - Host role for impartial summary and verdict Based on xiaonuo's debate workflow design.
This commit is contained in:
+135
-56
@@ -1,63 +1,142 @@
|
||||
name: "debate"
|
||||
description: "Structured debate between two sides. Tests cross-process session resume."
|
||||
name: debate
|
||||
description: "Multi-role structured debate with critical thinking framework and host summary."
|
||||
|
||||
roles:
|
||||
against:
|
||||
description: "Argues against the proposition"
|
||||
goal: |
|
||||
You are a skilled debater arguing AGAINST the proposition.
|
||||
Be logical, cite evidence, and directly address your opponent's points.
|
||||
Keep each argument concise (under 200 words).
|
||||
capabilities:
|
||||
- argumentation
|
||||
- critical-thinking
|
||||
proponent:
|
||||
description: "Argues FOR the proposition"
|
||||
goal: "Build a compelling case for the proposition through logical reasoning and evidence"
|
||||
capabilities: []
|
||||
procedure: |
|
||||
1. If this is the opening, present your strongest argument against the proposition.
|
||||
2. If responding to the other side, directly counter their points with evidence and logic.
|
||||
3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
|
||||
output: |
|
||||
Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
|
||||
Set status to "conceded" ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Otherwise set status to "continue".
|
||||
You are an experienced scholar arguing FOR the proposition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Thinking Framework (execute before every speech)
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Pre-speech reflection (internal, do not output)
|
||||
- Does every step in my argument chain hold? Any hidden assumptions or logical gaps?
|
||||
- If I were my opponent, how would I attack this? Where am I weakest?
|
||||
- Does my evidence actually support my claim, or could it backfire?
|
||||
- Should I go on offense or defense this round?
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Evidence discipline
|
||||
- Verify key numbers — watch for order-of-magnitude errors
|
||||
- Assess data freshness — fast-moving fields have short half-lives
|
||||
- Distinguish primary data from secondary citations, expert opinion, and common assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Anti-fragility
|
||||
- Anticipate counterarguments; preemptively strengthen or strategically abandon weak points
|
||||
- Catch logical gaps, data misuse, or outdated claims in your opponent's reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
1. Check Thread Progress to see how many times you have spoken.
|
||||
2. On your 3rd speech, you MUST output $status: final (closing statement).
|
||||
3. If genuinely convinced by the opponent, output $status: conceded.
|
||||
4. Otherwise output $status: speak and counter the opponent's points.
|
||||
5. Be rigorous, cite evidence, stay concise.
|
||||
output: "Debate argument"
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
oneOf:
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: speak }
|
||||
argument: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, argument]
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: conceded }
|
||||
reason: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, reason]
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: final }
|
||||
closing: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, closing]
|
||||
|
||||
opponent:
|
||||
description: "Argues AGAINST the proposition"
|
||||
goal: "Build a compelling case against the proposition through logical reasoning and evidence"
|
||||
capabilities: []
|
||||
procedure: |
|
||||
You are an experienced scholar arguing AGAINST the proposition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Thinking Framework (execute before every speech)
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Pre-speech reflection (internal, do not output)
|
||||
- Does every step in my argument chain hold? Any hidden assumptions or logical gaps?
|
||||
- If I were my opponent, how would I attack this? Where am I weakest?
|
||||
- Does my evidence actually support my claim, or could it backfire?
|
||||
- Should I go on offense or defense this round?
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Evidence discipline
|
||||
- Verify key numbers — watch for order-of-magnitude errors
|
||||
- Assess data freshness — fast-moving fields have short half-lives
|
||||
- Distinguish primary data from secondary citations, expert opinion, and common assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Anti-fragility
|
||||
- Anticipate counterarguments; preemptively strengthen or strategically abandon weak points
|
||||
- Catch logical gaps, data misuse, or outdated claims in your opponent's reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
1. Check Thread Progress to see how many times you have spoken.
|
||||
2. On your 3rd speech, or when the proponent has issued a final statement, you MUST output $status: final.
|
||||
3. If genuinely convinced by the proponent, output $status: conceded.
|
||||
4. Otherwise output $status: speak and counter the proponent's points.
|
||||
5. Be rigorous, cite evidence, stay concise.
|
||||
output: "Debate argument"
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
oneOf:
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: speak }
|
||||
argument: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, argument]
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: conceded }
|
||||
reason: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, reason]
|
||||
- properties:
|
||||
$status: { const: final }
|
||||
closing: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, closing]
|
||||
|
||||
host:
|
||||
description: "Debate moderator — delivers impartial summary and verdict"
|
||||
goal: "Objectively review the debate, analyze both sides, and deliver a verdict"
|
||||
capabilities: []
|
||||
procedure: |
|
||||
You are an experienced academic debate moderator.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task
|
||||
1. Outline each side's core arguments
|
||||
2. Evaluate reasoning quality and evidence use
|
||||
3. Highlight the most impactful exchanges
|
||||
4. Analyze the deeper significance of the topic
|
||||
5. Deliver an overall verdict
|
||||
|
||||
## Style
|
||||
- Impartial but with independent judgment
|
||||
- Substantive, not superficial
|
||||
output: "Debate summary report"
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
$status:
|
||||
enum: ["continue", "conceded"]
|
||||
argument:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [$status, argument]
|
||||
for:
|
||||
description: "Argues for the proposition"
|
||||
goal: |
|
||||
You are a skilled debater arguing FOR the proposition.
|
||||
Be logical, cite evidence, and directly address your opponent's points.
|
||||
Keep each argument concise (under 200 words).
|
||||
capabilities:
|
||||
- argumentation
|
||||
- critical-thinking
|
||||
procedure: |
|
||||
1. Read the opposing side's latest argument carefully.
|
||||
2. Counter their points with evidence and logic.
|
||||
3. If you find yourself genuinely convinced by the other side, you may concede.
|
||||
output: |
|
||||
Provide your argument in the frontmatter.
|
||||
Set status to "conceded" ONLY if you are genuinely convinced and wish to stop debating.
|
||||
Otherwise set status to "continue".
|
||||
frontmatter:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
$status:
|
||||
enum: ["continue", "conceded"]
|
||||
argument:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
required: [$status, argument]
|
||||
$status: { const: done }
|
||||
summary: { type: string }
|
||||
highlights: { type: string }
|
||||
verdict: { type: string }
|
||||
required: [$status, summary, highlights, verdict]
|
||||
|
||||
graph:
|
||||
$START:
|
||||
new: { role: "against", prompt: "Present your opening argument against the proposition." }
|
||||
resume: { role: "against", prompt: "Review the previous debate output and continue the argument against the proposition." }
|
||||
against:
|
||||
conceded: { role: "$END", prompt: "The against side conceded. Debate over." }
|
||||
continue: { role: "for", prompt: "Counter the opposing argument: {{{argument}}}" }
|
||||
for:
|
||||
conceded: { role: "$END", prompt: "The for side conceded. Debate over." }
|
||||
continue: { role: "against", prompt: "Counter the opposing argument: {{{argument}}}" }
|
||||
new: { role: proponent, prompt: "The debate begins. You are arguing FOR the proposition. Present your opening argument." }
|
||||
resume: { role: proponent, prompt: "The debate continues." }
|
||||
|
||||
proponent:
|
||||
speak: { role: opponent, prompt: "Proponent argues:\n\n{{{argument}}}\n\nYou are the opponent. Counter this argument." }
|
||||
conceded: { role: host, prompt: "The proponent conceded: {{{reason}}}\n\nPlease summarize the debate." }
|
||||
final: { role: opponent, prompt: "Proponent's closing statement:\n\n{{{closing}}}\n\nYou are the opponent. Deliver your final response." }
|
||||
|
||||
opponent:
|
||||
speak: { role: proponent, prompt: "Opponent argues:\n\n{{{argument}}}\n\nYou are the proponent. Counter this argument." }
|
||||
conceded: { role: host, prompt: "The opponent conceded: {{{reason}}}\n\nPlease summarize the debate." }
|
||||
final: { role: host, prompt: "Opponent's closing statement:\n\n{{{closing}}}\n\nThe debate is over. Please summarize." }
|
||||
|
||||
host:
|
||||
done: { role: "$END", prompt: "Summary complete." }
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user