Replace the original 2-role debate with a 3-role version featuring:
- proponent/opponent/host roles (was: for/against)
- oneOf + const status routing (was: enum)
- Critical thinking framework in procedure (pre-speech reflection,
evidence discipline, anti-fragility)
- Bounded termination via Thread Progress (3rd speech → final)
- Host role for impartial summary and verdict
Based on xiaonuo's debate workflow design.
BREAKING: All workflow YAML files must update $START._ to $START.new + $START.resume.
The resume edge prompt replaces the previously hardcoded resume message.
- evaluate.ts: remove START_ROLE/START_STATUS special case, use $status like all nodes
- thread.ts: resolveEvaluateArgs passes 'new', cmdThreadResume passes 'resume'
- validate.ts: reject '_' everywhere (no longer valid)
- validate-semantic.ts: require 'new' and 'resume' edges on $START
- All workflow YAMLs and test fixtures updated
Fixes#101
- evaluate() reads $status instead of status, defaults to _ when missing
- Update all YAML examples and .workflows to use $status
- Update cli-workflow resolveEvaluateArgs to use $status
- 10 moderator tests pass including new default _ test
- Single-exit roles no longer need to declare status field
Phase 1 of #499 (closes#500)
- Migrate solve-issue.yaml, analyze-topic.yaml, debate.yaml to new format
- Add status enum field to all role frontmatter schemas
- Use {{{ }}} (triple mustache) for prompt templates with user content
- Disable mustache HTML escaping globally (prompts are plain text, not HTML)
- Add 2 new tests for HTML escape behavior
- 9 moderator tests pass
Phase 2 of #490 (closes#492)
Two-role debate (against/for) with up to 3 rounds per side.
Each role re-enters with session resume, making this an ideal
integration test for cross-process session continuity.
Supports early termination via concession (conceded=true in frontmatter).
Refs #418
xiaoju