xiaomo
04e2b5b8a7
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
26 cards covering: - Project philosophy (session isolation, process discipline, dissipative structure) - Comparisons (vs skill, vs dynamic workflow) - Business rationale (FTE vs vendor, OPC, switching cost) - Learning model (memory + skill + workflow) - Self-improvement (reflective workflow, eval) - Open questions (workflow granularity, human-in-the-loop)
21 lines
825 B
Markdown
21 lines
825 B
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Open Question — Workflow Granularity and Composition"
|
|
created: "2026-06-07"
|
|
source: "openclaw-xiaomo"
|
|
tags: [architecture, open-question]
|
|
category: "architecture"
|
|
links:
|
|
- cognitive-process-orchestration
|
|
- skill-vs-workflow-different-layers
|
|
- domain-experts-own-the-process
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**待讨论。**
|
|
|
|
Workflow 的粒度问题：solve-issue 是端到端的大 workflow（planner → developer → reviewer → tester → committer），但现实中有些场景只需要管一个环节（比如只用 uwf 管 code review，其他部分用 skill 或手动）。
|
|
|
|
问题：
|
|
- Workflow 是否应该支持嵌套或组合——小 workflow 作为大 workflow 的一个 role？
|
|
- 还是粒度完全由用户自己决定，引擎不需要管？
|
|
- 组合式 workflow 和单体 workflow 各自的 trade-off 是什么？
|