xiaomo
c128fad38e
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m51s
- agent-as-graduate: onboarding metaphor and teaching threshold - three-learning-carriers: memory/skill/workflow framework - switching-cost-process-knowledge-as-moat: process knowledge as moat - opc-why-fte-agents-matter-most: why OpenClaw bets on FTE - fte-maturity-threshold: who can onboard an agent - fte-product-landscape: OpenClaw vs Claude Code vs Hermes
24 lines
1000 B
Markdown
24 lines
1000 B
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "FTE Product Landscape — OpenClaw, Claude Code, Hermes"
|
|
created: "2026-06-07"
|
|
source: "openclaw-xiaomo"
|
|
tags: [concept, comparison]
|
|
category: "product"
|
|
links:
|
|
- vendor-vs-fte-who-defines-capability
|
|
- three-learning-carriers
|
|
- fte-maturity-threshold
|
|
- agent-as-graduate
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
2026 年中，FTE 型 agent 的代表产品对比：
|
|
|
|
**共性**：都有 memory、skill、workflow/多步协作机制，都面向技术用户。
|
|
|
|
**差异点**：
|
|
- **OpenClaw** — uwf 引擎驱动，用 YAML 定义多角色 workflow，强调流程纪律和 session 隔离。面向团队级 agent 协作。
|
|
- **Claude Code** — Anthropic 官方 CLI agent，CLAUDE.md 作为 memory，skill 通过项目约定积累。单 agent 深度协作，开发者体验好。
|
|
- **Hermes** — 跨平台 agent 协调者，memory/skill/cron 体系完善，支持多 agent 调度。偏个人效率工具。
|
|
|
|
三者都谈不上成熟。成熟的标志不是技术完备度，而是**非技术用户能否用起来**。
|