Files
united-workforce/.cards/cold-start-same-entry-different-exit.md
T
xiaomo 04e2b5b8a7
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
docs: expand .cards — vision, comparisons, business rationale, open questions
26 cards covering:
- Project philosophy (session isolation, process discipline, dissipative structure)
- Comparisons (vs skill, vs dynamic workflow)
- Business rationale (FTE vs vendor, OPC, switching cost)
- Learning model (memory + skill + workflow)
- Self-improvement (reflective workflow, eval)
- Open questions (workflow granularity, human-in-the-loop)
2026-06-07 11:43:52 +00:00

21 lines
988 B
Markdown

---
title: "Cold Start — Same Entry Point, Different Exit"
created: "2026-06-07"
source: "openclaw-xiaomo"
tags: [architecture, pattern]
category: "architecture"
links:
- uwf-vs-dynamic-workflow
- process-authorship-human-ai-vs-delegation
- workflow-as-improvable-system
- agent-as-graduate
---
uwf 的冷启动不比 dw 更复杂——起点完全一样:用户描述任务,agent 执行。
区别在出口:dw 跑完即丢,uwf 跑完后沉淀成 workflow YAML,用户可以审查、调优、复用。workflow 不一定要用户写,往往也是 agent 写的——跟 dw 一样的模式。uwf 和 dw 的差异不在"谁写流程",而在"流程跑完后去哪"。
冷启动路径:agent 先跑一次临时流程 → 用户觉得好就固化成 workflow → 下次同类任务直接复用 → 用过几次后根据经验调优。从零门槛的即兴执行,渐进演化为成熟的可复用流程。
入口像 dw 一样低,出口比 dw 多了一个沉淀层。