Compare commits

..

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
xingyue 86205f1a15 improve: committer — check git status before staging (from retrospect PR #578)
Developer already commits changes, so committer's git add -A is redundant.
Now checks git status first and skips to push if tree is clean.
2026-05-30 15:45:17 +08:00
xingyue f741729b41 feat: retrospect-workflow — add Phase 0 validation
- Check workflow exists in current project, block with wrong_project if not
- Compare thread's workflow hash vs current version
- If versions differ, diff and filter out already-fixed findings
- New status: wrong_project → $END with clear error message
2026-05-30 15:32:33 +08:00
xingyue 5b26602fd4 fix: retrospect-workflow — proposer/developer must work in workflow repo, not analyzed repo
First trial run revealed that proposer set repoPath to the analyzed repo (json-cas),
causing developer to create worktrees there and pick up unrelated changes.
Reviewer correctly rejected 3 times but developer couldn't fix it because
the procedure was fundamentally pointing at the wrong repo.
2026-05-30 15:28:24 +08:00
xingyue f12b60385a test: update worktree test to match new tea pr create procedure
tea pr create should run from main repo dir instead of using --repo flag,
because tea cannot detect repo from worktree .git files.
2026-05-30 14:24:33 +08:00
xingyue d54d448585 fix: committer procedure — tea pr create must run from main repo, not worktree
tea cannot detect repo from worktree .git files, causing repeated failures.
Also removed --repo flag guidance — let tea auto-detect from git remote.
2026-05-30 14:23:37 +08:00
23 changed files with 309 additions and 156 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ packages/workflow-template-develop/develop.esm.js
.DS_Store
*.py
.claude
tmp.worktrees/
tmp
+220
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
name: "retrospect-workflow"
description: "Post-execution retrospective: analyze a completed thread, find inefficiencies, and improve the workflow definition."
roles:
analyst:
description: "Scans thread execution for anomalies and produces a findings report"
goal: "You are a workflow execution analyst. You review completed thread data to find inefficiencies, wasted effort, and procedure gaps."
capabilities:
- data-analysis
procedure: |
You receive a completed thread ID in your task prompt.
Phase 0 — Validation (must pass before any analysis):
1. Run `uwf step list <thread-id>` to get thread metadata including the workflow hash
2. Run `uwf workflow show <workflow-hash>` to get the workflow name
3. Verify the workflow exists locally: check `.workflows/<name>.yaml` in the current repo
- If NOT found: output $status=wrong_project with the workflow name. Do NOT proceed.
4. Compare the thread's workflow hash against the current registered version:
- Run `uwf workflow show <name>` to get the current hash
- If hashes differ: the thread ran on an older version. Note this — you will need to diff versions after analysis.
Phase 1 — Overview scan:
5. From the step list, compute a health signal for each step:
- Duration: flag if >2x the median of other steps
- Output tokens: flag if >2x the median
- Status flow: flag non-happy-path transitions (rejected, fix_code, fix_spec, hook_failed)
- Step count: flag if the same role appears more than expected (indicates loops)
6. If no anomalies found AND versions match: output $status=clean
7. If no anomalies found BUT versions differ:
- Diff the two workflow versions to check if any procedure changes are relevant
- If the current version already addresses potential concerns: output $status=clean with a note
- Otherwise: proceed to Phase 2
Phase 2 — Targeted deep-dive (only for flagged steps):
8. For each flagged step, run `uwf step show <hash>` to get the detail with turns
9. Analyze the turn sequence for:
- Repeated tool calls with the same or similar input (blind retries)
- Tool errors followed by no strategy change (same approach retried)
- Unnecessary exploration (reading files or running commands unrelated to the task)
- Hallucinated commands or flags (commands that don't exist or wrong syntax)
- Excessive turns before reaching the goal
10. For each finding, record:
- Which role and step hash
- What happened (specific turn indices and commands)
- Root cause hypothesis (procedure gap, missing pitfall, unclear instruction)
- Suggested fix (what to add/change in the procedure)
11. If versions differ: compare findings against the version diff.
Mark any finding that is already fixed in the current version as "resolved_in_current".
Only report findings that are NOT yet addressed.
Output a structured findings report. Set $status=clean if nothing actionable, $status=findings if unresolved issues exist, or $status=wrong_project if the workflow doesn't belong here.
output: "A findings report with per-issue root cause and suggested procedure fixes. Set $status to clean or findings (with report hash)."
frontmatter:
oneOf:
- properties:
$status: { const: "clean" }
summary: { type: string }
required: [$status, summary]
- properties:
$status: { const: "findings" }
report: { type: string }
targetWorkflow: { type: string }
required: [$status, report, targetWorkflow]
- properties:
$status: { const: "wrong_project" }
workflowName: { type: string }
required: [$status, workflowName]
proposer:
description: "Translates findings into concrete workflow edits"
goal: "You are a workflow improvement proposer. You read the analyst's findings and produce specific, minimal edits to the workflow YAML."
capabilities:
- planning
procedure: |
1. Read the analyst's findings report from your task prompt
2. Locate the target workflow YAML:
- Workflow definitions live in the WORKFLOW ENGINE repo (where `uwf` is developed), NOT in the repo that was analyzed.
- Find it via: `uwf workflow show <targetWorkflow> --format yaml` to read the current definition
- The physical file is `.workflows/<targetWorkflow>.yaml` in the workflow engine repo
- Use `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` in the current directory to find the workflow engine repo root
3. Read the current workflow YAML to understand existing procedures
4. For each finding, draft a minimal edit:
- Prefer adding a pitfall note or clarifying instruction over restructuring
- If a procedure step is ambiguous, make it explicit
- If a tool usage pattern is wrong, add a "Do NOT" or "IMPORTANT" note
- Keep edits surgical — don't rewrite procedures that work fine
5. Check if existing tests need updating (search for test files referencing the workflow)
6. Produce a change plan as CAS text node via `uwf cas put-text "<plan>"`
The plan should list each edit with:
- File path
- What to change (old text → new text, or addition)
- Why (linked to which finding)
- Any test updates needed
output: "A change plan stored in CAS. Set $status to ready (with plan hash and repoPath) or no_action (if findings don't warrant changes)."
frontmatter:
oneOf:
- properties:
$status: { const: "ready" }
plan: { type: string }
repoPath: { type: string }
required: [$status, plan, repoPath]
- properties:
$status: { const: "no_action" }
reason: { type: string }
required: [$status, reason]
developer:
description: "Applies the proposed workflow edits"
goal: "You are a developer agent. You apply workflow YAML edits and update related tests."
capabilities:
- coding
procedure: |
IMPORTANT: Always work in a git worktree, NEVER modify the main working directory directly.
The workflow definitions live in THIS repo (the workflow engine), not the repo that was analyzed.
Before starting any work, set up an isolated worktree:
1. Use `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` to find the repo root (do NOT use repoPath from proposer — that's the analyzed repo)
2. `git fetch origin` to get latest refs
3. `git worktree add .worktrees/retrospect/<short-slug> -b retrospect/<short-slug> origin/main`
4. `cd .worktrees/retrospect/<short-slug> && bun install`
5. ALL subsequent work must happen inside the worktree directory.
Then apply changes:
6. Read the change plan from CAS: `uwf cas get <plan hash>`
7. Apply each edit from the plan to the workflow YAML
8. Update or add tests as specified in the plan
9. Run `bun run build` and `bun test` to verify
10. Run `bun run check` for lint
11. Commit with message: `improve: <workflow-name> — <brief summary>`
output: "List all files changed and provide a summary. Set $status to done (with branch/worktree), or failed (with reason)."
frontmatter:
oneOf:
- properties:
$status: { const: "done" }
branch: { type: string }
worktree: { type: string }
required: [$status, branch, worktree]
- properties:
$status: { const: "failed" }
reason: { type: string }
required: [$status, reason]
reviewer:
description: "Reviews the workflow edits for correctness"
goal: "You are a reviewer. You verify that workflow edits are minimal, correct, and actually address the findings."
capabilities:
- code-review
procedure: |
The worktree path is provided in your task prompt. cd into it first.
Review criteria:
1. Each edit must trace back to a specific finding — no drive-by changes
2. Edits should be minimal — don't rewrite working procedures
3. New pitfall notes or instructions must be clear and actionable
4. Tests must be updated if assertions changed
5. `bun run build` and `bun test` must pass
6. `bunx biome check` must pass
IMPORTANT: `tea pr create` must run from the MAIN repo directory (not a worktree), because tea cannot detect the repo from worktree `.git` files.
output: "Explain your decision. Set $status to approved (with branch/worktree) or rejected (with comments)."
frontmatter:
oneOf:
- properties:
$status: { const: "approved" }
branch: { type: string }
worktree: { type: string }
required: [$status, branch, worktree]
- properties:
$status: { const: "rejected" }
comments: { type: string }
worktree: { type: string }
required: [$status, comments, worktree]
committer:
description: "Commits and creates PR"
goal: "You are a committer agent. You create a clean commit and push a PR."
capabilities: []
procedure: |
The worktree path, branch name, and repo info are provided in your task prompt.
cd into the worktree first.
Note: You inherit the developer's worktree and branch. Do NOT create a new branch.
1. Stage all changes: `git add -A`
2. Commit with a descriptive message: `git commit -m "improve: <workflow> — <summary>"`
3. Push the branch: `git push -u origin <branch-name>`
- If push hook fails: capture the error log in your output, mark hook_failed
4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --title "..." --description "..."`
- IMPORTANT: `tea pr create` must run from the MAIN repo directory (not a worktree), because tea cannot detect the repo from worktree `.git` files. cd to the repo root first.
- Do NOT pass `--repo` — let tea auto-detect from the main repo's git remote.
- PR description must include: What / Why / Findings / Changes sections
- On tea failure: capture stderr/stdout, include PR details for manual creation, mark hook_failed
5. After PR creation, clean up the worktree:
- cd to the repo root (parent of .worktrees)
- `git worktree remove <worktree-path>`
output: "Include PR URL on success or error log on failure. Set $status to committed (with prUrl) or hook_failed (with error)."
frontmatter:
oneOf:
- properties:
$status: { const: "committed" }
prUrl: { type: string }
required: [$status, prUrl]
- properties:
$status: { const: "hook_failed" }
error: { type: string }
required: [$status, error]
graph:
$START:
_: { role: "analyst", prompt: "Analyze completed thread {{{threadId}}} for execution anomalies." }
analyst:
clean: { role: "$END", prompt: "No issues found. Thread executed cleanly." }
findings: { role: "proposer", prompt: "Findings report: {{{report}}}. Target workflow: {{{targetWorkflow}}}. Propose minimal edits." }
wrong_project: { role: "$END", prompt: "Thread uses workflow '{{{workflowName}}}' which does not exist in this project. Run retrospect from the correct repo." }
proposer:
no_action: { role: "$END", prompt: "No actionable changes needed: {{{reason}}}." }
ready: { role: "developer", prompt: "Apply the change plan (CAS hash: {{{plan}}}) to the workflow definitions in this repo." }
developer:
done: { role: "reviewer", prompt: "Review workflow edits on branch {{{branch}}} at {{{worktree}}}." }
failed: { role: "$END", prompt: "Developer failed: {{{reason}}}. Ending workflow." }
reviewer:
rejected: { role: "developer", prompt: "Reviewer rejected: {{{comments}}}. Fix the issues in {{{worktree}}}." }
approved: { role: "committer", prompt: "Approved. Commit and push branch {{{branch}}} from {{{worktree}}}." }
committer:
hook_failed: { role: "developer", prompt: "Push hook failed: {{{error}}}. Fix and re-submit." }
committed: { role: "$END", prompt: "PR created: {{{prUrl}}}. Workflow improved." }
+5 -4
View File
@@ -155,12 +155,13 @@ roles:
cd into the worktree first.
Note: You inherit the developer's worktree and branch. Do NOT create a new branch.
1. Stage all changes: `git add -A`
2. Commit with a descriptive message referencing the issue: `git commit -m "type: description\n\nFixes #N"`
1. Check `git status` — if working tree is clean and branch is ahead of origin, skip to step 3 (push).
2. If there are unstaged/uncommitted changes: `git add -A` then `git commit -m "type: description\n\nFixes #N"`
3. Push the branch: `git push -u origin <branch-name>`
- If push hook fails: capture the error log in your output, mark hook_failed
4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --repo <owner/repo> --title "..." --description "..."`
- Extract owner/repo from: `git remote get-url origin | sed 's/.*[:/]\([^/]*\/[^.]*\).*/\1/'`
4. On push success: create a PR via `tea pr create --title "..." --description "..."`
- IMPORTANT: `tea pr create` must run from the MAIN repo directory (not a worktree), because tea cannot detect the repo from worktree `.git` files. cd to the repo root first.
- Do NOT pass `--repo` — let tea auto-detect from the main repo's git remote.
- PR description must include: What / Why / Changes / Ref sections, with `Fixes #N` in Ref
- On tea failure: capture stderr/stdout, include PR details for manual creation, mark hook_failed
5. After PR creation, clean up the worktree:
+1 -1
View File
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ Everything else is immutable CAS content.
providers:
openrouter:
baseUrl: "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1"
apiKey: "sk-..."
apiKeyEnv: "OPENROUTER_API_KEY"
models:
sonnet:
+2 -2
View File
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ workflow 怎么配置和使用 model?
```136:160:packages/workflow-protocol/src/types.ts
export type ProviderConfig = {
baseUrl: string;
apiKey: string;
apiKeyEnv: string;
};
export type ModelConfig = {
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ export type WorkflowConfig = {
export function resolveModel(config: WorkflowConfig, alias: ModelAlias): ResolvedLlmProvider {
const modelEntry = config.models[alias];
const providerEntry = config.providers[modelEntry.provider];
const apiKey = providerEntry.apiKey;
const apiKey = process.env[providerEntry.apiKeyEnv];
return { baseUrl: providerEntry.baseUrl, apiKey, model: modelEntry.name };
}
```
+4 -4
View File
@@ -280,13 +280,13 @@ threads.yaml: { "01J7K9M2XNPQR5VWBCDF8G3H4T": "8FWKR3TN5V1QA" }
providers:
openai:
baseUrl: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
apiKey: "sk-..."
apiKeyEnv: "OPENAI_API_KEY"
anthropic:
baseUrl: "https://api.anthropic.com/v1"
apiKey: "sk-ant-..."
apiKeyEnv: "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"
openrouter:
baseUrl: "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1"
apiKey: "sk-or-..."
apiKeyEnv: "OPENROUTER_API_KEY"
models:
sonnet:
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ type Scenario = string; // e.g. "extract"
type ProviderConfig = {
baseUrl: string;
apiKey: string; // API key stored directly
apiKeyEnv: string; // env var name to read API key from
};
type ModelConfig = {
+1 -1
View File
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ uwf setup --provider openai --base-url https://api.openai.com/v1 \
--api-key sk-... --model gpt-4o --agent hermes
```
Config: `~/.uncaged/workflow/config.yaml` (includes API keys).
Config: `~/.uncaged/workflow/config.yaml`. API keys: `~/.uncaged/workflow/.env`.
### Skill
+1 -1
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
],
"type": "module",
"bin": {
"uwf": "./dist/cli.js"
"uwf": "./src/cli.ts"
},
"dependencies": {
"@uncaged/json-cas": "^0.5.3",
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ describe("resolveHeadHash", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: headHash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const result = await resolveHeadHash(tmpDir, threadId);
@@ -65,7 +64,6 @@ describe("resolveHeadHash", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: historicalHash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const result = await resolveHeadHash(tmpDir, threadId);
@@ -89,21 +87,18 @@ describe("resolveHeadHash", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: hash1,
completedAt: Date.now() - 2000,
reason: null,
});
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: threadId2,
workflow: workflowHash,
head: hash2,
completedAt: Date.now() - 1000,
reason: null,
});
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: threadId3,
workflow: workflowHash,
head: hash3,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const result = await resolveHeadHash(tmpDir, threadId2);
@@ -129,8 +129,9 @@ describe("cmdSetup with validation", () => {
const result = await cmdSetup(setupArgs());
expect(result.validation).toEqual({ ok: true, value: undefined });
// Config file should still be written
// Config files should still be written
expect(result.configPath).toBeTruthy();
expect(result.envPath).toBeTruthy();
});
test("includes validation failure — config still saved", async () => {
@@ -142,7 +143,8 @@ describe("cmdSetup with validation", () => {
expect(result.validation).toBeDefined();
expect((result.validation as { ok: boolean }).ok).toBe(false);
// Config file should still be written despite validation failure
// Config files should still be written despite validation failure
expect(result.configPath).toBeTruthy();
expect(result.envPath).toBeTruthy();
});
});
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ describe("solve-issue workflow: tea pr create worktree fix", () => {
"solve-issue.yaml",
);
test("committer procedure should include --repo flag in tea pr create command", async () => {
test("committer procedure should require running tea pr create from main repo directory", async () => {
const yamlContent = await readFile(workflowPath, "utf-8");
const workflow = parse(yamlContent) as WorkflowPayload;
@@ -32,19 +32,12 @@ describe("solve-issue workflow: tea pr create worktree fix", () => {
const committerProcedure = workflow.roles.committer?.procedure;
expect(committerProcedure).toBeDefined();
// Verify the procedure includes tea pr create with --repo flag
// Verify the procedure includes tea pr create
expect(committerProcedure).toContain("tea pr create");
expect(committerProcedure).toContain("--repo");
// Verify the --repo flag appears before or together with tea pr create
// This ensures the command is: tea pr create --repo <owner/repo> ...
const teaPrCreateMatch = committerProcedure?.match(/tea pr create[^\n]*/);
expect(teaPrCreateMatch).not.toBeNull();
if (teaPrCreateMatch) {
const teaCommandLine = teaPrCreateMatch[0];
expect(teaCommandLine).toContain("--repo");
}
// Verify the procedure warns about running from main repo dir (not worktree)
expect(committerProcedure).toMatch(/main repo directory/i);
expect(committerProcedure).toMatch(/not a worktree/i);
});
test("committer procedure should mention repo extraction from git remote", async () => {
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
import { mkdtemp } from "node:fs/promises";
import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
import { join } from "node:path";
import type { CasRef, ThreadId } from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest";
import { appendThreadHistory, loadThreadHistory } from "../store.js";
describe("thread cancel status", () => {
test("cancelled history entry has reason 'cancelled'", async () => {
const tmpDir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "uwf-cancel-test-"));
const threadId = "01JTEST000000000000CANCEL1" as ThreadId;
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: threadId,
workflow: "test-workflow",
head: "test-head-hash" as CasRef,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "cancelled",
});
const history = await loadThreadHistory(tmpDir);
expect(history).toHaveLength(1);
expect(history[0]?.reason).toBe("cancelled");
});
test("completed history entry has reason 'completed'", async () => {
const tmpDir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "uwf-cancel-test-"));
const threadId = "01JTEST000000000000CANCEL2" as ThreadId;
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: threadId,
workflow: "test-workflow",
head: "test-head-hash" as CasRef,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "completed",
});
const history = await loadThreadHistory(tmpDir);
expect(history).toHaveLength(1);
expect(history[0]?.reason).toBe("completed");
});
test("legacy history entry without reason parses as null", async () => {
const tmpDir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "uwf-cancel-test-"));
const threadId = "01JTEST000000000000CANCEL3" as ThreadId;
// Simulate legacy entry without reason field
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: threadId,
workflow: "test-workflow",
head: "test-head-hash" as CasRef,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const history = await loadThreadHistory(tmpDir);
expect(history).toHaveLength(1);
expect(history[0]?.reason).toBeNull();
});
test("mixed completed and cancelled entries preserve distinct reasons", async () => {
const tmpDir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "uwf-cancel-test-"));
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: "01JTEST000000000000CANCEL4" as ThreadId,
workflow: "test-workflow",
head: "head1" as CasRef,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "completed",
});
await appendThreadHistory(tmpDir, {
thread: "01JTEST000000000000CANCEL5" as ThreadId,
workflow: "test-workflow",
head: "head2" as CasRef,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "cancelled",
});
const history = await loadThreadHistory(tmpDir);
expect(history).toHaveLength(2);
expect(history[0]?.reason).toBe("completed");
expect(history[1]?.reason).toBe("cancelled");
});
});
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ async function completeThread(
workflow: workflowHash,
head: headHash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
}
@@ -758,7 +758,6 @@ describe("cmdStepList with completed threads", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: step2Hash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const result = await cmdStepList(tmpDir, threadId);
@@ -887,7 +886,6 @@ describe("cmdStepShow with completed threads", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: stepHash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const result = await cmdStepShow(tmpDir, stepHash);
@@ -951,7 +949,6 @@ describe("cmdThreadRead with completed threads", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: stepHash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const markdown = await cmdThreadRead(tmpDir, threadId, THREAD_READ_DEFAULT_QUOTA, null, false);
@@ -1014,7 +1011,6 @@ describe("cmdThreadRead with completed threads", () => {
workflow: workflowHash,
head: step3Hash,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: null,
});
const markdown = await cmdThreadRead(
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
#!/usr/bin/env node
#!/usr/bin/env bun
import type { CasRef, ThreadId } from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
import { Command } from "commander";
@@ -181,11 +181,11 @@ function parseStatusFilter(status: string | undefined): ThreadStatus[] | null {
if (raw === "active") return ["idle", "running"];
const parts = raw.split(",").map((s) => s.trim());
const validStatuses: ThreadStatus[] = ["idle", "running", "completed", "cancelled"];
const validStatuses: ThreadStatus[] = ["idle", "running", "completed"];
for (const part of parts) {
if (!validStatuses.includes(part as ThreadStatus)) {
process.stderr.write(
`Invalid status: ${part}. Must be one of: idle, running, completed, cancelled, active\n`,
`Invalid status: ${part}. Must be one of: idle, running, completed, active\n`,
);
process.exit(1);
}
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ thread
.description("List threads")
.option(
"--status <status>",
"Filter by status: idle, running, completed, cancelled, active (idle+running), or comma-separated values",
"Filter by status: idle, running, completed, active (idle+running), or comma-separated values",
)
.option("--after <date>", "Filter threads created after this date (ISO or relative like '7d')")
.option("--before <date>", "Filter threads created before this date (ISO or relative like '7d')")
+45 -1
View File
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ function getConfigPath(root: string): string {
return join(root, "config.yaml");
}
function getEnvPath(root: string): string {
return join(root, ".env");
}
/**
* Load existing config.yaml or return empty structure.
*/
@@ -102,6 +106,37 @@ function loadExistingConfig(configPath: string): Record<string, unknown> {
return {};
}
/**
* Load existing .env as key=value map.
*/
function loadEnvFile(envPath: string): Record<string, string> {
const env: Record<string, string> = {};
try {
if (existsSync(envPath)) {
for (const line of readFileSync(envPath, "utf8").split("\n")) {
const trimmed = line.trim();
if (trimmed === "" || trimmed.startsWith("#")) continue;
const eq = trimmed.indexOf("=");
if (eq > 0) {
env[trimmed.slice(0, eq)] = trimmed.slice(eq + 1);
}
}
}
} catch {
// ignore
}
return env;
}
function saveEnvFile(envPath: string, env: Record<string, string>): void {
const lines = Object.entries(env).map(([k, v]) => `${k}=${v}`);
writeFileSync(envPath, `${lines.join("\n")}\n`, "utf8");
}
function apiKeyEnvName(providerName: string): string {
return `${providerName.toUpperCase().replace(/[^A-Z0-9]/g, "_")}_API_KEY`;
}
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Extracted helpers — _discoverAgents
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -362,7 +397,8 @@ function mergeConfig(existing: Record<string, unknown>, args: SetupArgs): Record
: {}
) as Record<string, unknown>;
providers[args.provider] = { baseUrl: args.baseUrl, apiKey: args.apiKey };
const envName = apiKeyEnvName(args.provider);
providers[args.provider] = { baseUrl: args.baseUrl, apiKeyEnv: envName };
const models = (
typeof existing.models === "object" && existing.models !== null
@@ -401,17 +437,25 @@ export async function cmdSetup(args: SetupArgs): Promise<Record<string, unknown>
mkdirSync(storageRoot, { recursive: true });
const configPath = getConfigPath(storageRoot);
const envPath = getEnvPath(storageRoot);
const existing = loadExistingConfig(configPath);
const merged = mergeConfig(existing, args);
writeFileSync(configPath, stringify(merged, { indent: 2 }), "utf8");
// Write API key to .env
const envName = apiKeyEnvName(args.provider);
const envData = loadEnvFile(envPath);
envData[envName] = args.apiKey;
saveEnvFile(envPath, envData);
// Validate model connectivity
const validation = await validateModel(args.baseUrl, args.apiKey, args.model);
return {
configPath,
envPath,
provider: args.provider,
model: args.model,
defaultAgent: merged.defaultAgent,
+3 -8
View File
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ export async function cmdThreadShow(storageRoot: string, threadId: ThreadId): Pr
fail(`thread not found: ${threadId}`);
}
export type ThreadStatus = "idle" | "running" | "completed" | "cancelled";
export type ThreadStatus = "idle" | "running" | "completed";
export type ThreadListItemWithStatus = ThreadListItem & {
status: ThreadStatus;
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ async function collectCompletedThreads(
thread: entry.thread,
workflow: entry.workflow,
head: entry.head,
status: entry.reason === "cancelled" ? "cancelled" : "completed",
status: "completed",
});
}
}
@@ -444,10 +444,7 @@ export async function cmdThreadList(
let items = await collectActiveThreads(storageRoot, uwf, index);
// Collect completed threads (if relevant for status filter)
const includeCompleted =
statusFilter === null ||
statusFilter.includes("completed") ||
statusFilter.includes("cancelled");
const includeCompleted = statusFilter === null || statusFilter.includes("completed");
if (includeCompleted) {
const activeIds = new Set(items.map((i) => i.thread));
const completedItems = await collectCompletedThreads(storageRoot, activeIds);
@@ -814,7 +811,6 @@ async function archiveThread(
workflow,
head,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "completed",
});
}
@@ -1151,7 +1147,6 @@ export async function cmdThreadCancel(
workflow,
head,
completedAt: Date.now(),
reason: "cancelled",
};
await appendThreadHistory(storageRoot, historyEntry);
+1 -10
View File
@@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ export function getHistoryPath(storageRoot: string): string {
export type ThreadHistoryLine = ThreadListItem & {
completedAt: number;
reason: "completed" | "cancelled" | null;
};
export type UwfStore = {
@@ -229,15 +228,7 @@ export async function loadThreadHistory(storageRoot: string): Promise<ThreadHist
typeof head === "string" &&
typeof completedAt === "number"
) {
const reason = rec.reason;
const parsedReason = reason === "completed" || reason === "cancelled" ? reason : null;
lines.push({
thread: thread as ThreadId,
workflow,
head,
completedAt,
reason: parsedReason,
});
lines.push({ thread: thread as ThreadId, workflow, head, completedAt });
}
}
return lines;
View File
+1 -1
View File
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ type ProviderAlias = string;
type ModelAlias = string;
type AgentAlias = string;
type ProviderConfig = { baseUrl: string; apiKey: string };
type ProviderConfig = { baseUrl: string; apiKeyEnv: string };
type ModelConfig = {
provider: ProviderAlias;
name: string;
+1 -1
View File
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ export type Scenario = string;
export type ProviderConfig = {
baseUrl: string;
apiKey: string;
apiKeyEnv: string;
};
export type ModelConfig = {
+6 -4
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
import { getSchema, validate } from "@uncaged/json-cas";
import type { CasRef, ModelAlias, WorkflowConfig } from "@uncaged/workflow-protocol";
import { createAgentStore, resolveStorageRoot } from "./storage.js";
import { config as loadDotenv } from "dotenv";
import { createAgentStore, getEnvPath, resolveStorageRoot } from "./storage.js";
export type ResolvedLlmProvider = {
baseUrl: string;
@@ -37,9 +38,9 @@ export function resolveModel(config: WorkflowConfig, alias: ModelAlias): Resolve
if (providerEntry === undefined) {
throw new Error(`unknown provider "${modelEntry.provider}" for model "${alias}"`);
}
const apiKey = providerEntry.apiKey;
const apiKey = process.env[providerEntry.apiKeyEnv];
if (apiKey === undefined || apiKey === "") {
throw new Error(`missing API key for provider: ${modelEntry.provider}`);
throw new Error(`missing API key env var: ${providerEntry.apiKeyEnv}`);
}
return {
baseUrl: providerEntry.baseUrl,
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ export type ExtractResult = {
/**
* Call an OpenAI-compatible LLM to extract structured output matching outputSchema.
* Loads config.yaml from the workflow storage root.
* Loads config.yaml and .env from the workflow storage root.
*/
export async function extract(
rawOutput: string,
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ export async function extract(
config: WorkflowConfig,
): Promise<ExtractResult> {
const storageRoot = resolveStorageRoot();
loadDotenv({ path: getEnvPath(storageRoot) });
const { store } = await createAgentStore(storageRoot);
const schema = getSchema(store, outputSchema);
+4 -4
View File
@@ -84,11 +84,11 @@ function normalizeProviders(raw: unknown): Record<ProviderAlias, ProviderConfig>
throw new Error(`config.providers.${name} must be a mapping`);
}
const baseUrl = entry.baseUrl;
const apiKey = entry.apiKey;
if (typeof baseUrl !== "string" || typeof apiKey !== "string") {
throw new Error(`config.providers.${name} requires baseUrl and apiKey`);
const apiKeyEnv = entry.apiKeyEnv;
if (typeof baseUrl !== "string" || typeof apiKeyEnv !== "string") {
throw new Error(`config.providers.${name} requires baseUrl and apiKeyEnv`);
}
providers[name] = { baseUrl, apiKey };
providers[name] = { baseUrl, apiKeyEnv };
}
return providers;
}